This site http://show.mappingworlds.com/world/ enables the visitor to change the size of countries of the world by choosing different criterion, including maternal and child mortality. Choose “People”, “Health”, “Maternal Mortality.”
Enjoy!
CleanBirth - Saving Mothers and Babies in Laos
CleanBirth.org - Donate $5 Saves 2 Lives
This site http://show.mappingworlds.com/world/ enables the visitor to change the size of countries of the world by choosing different criterion, including maternal and child mortality. Choose “People”, “Health”, “Maternal Mortality.”
Enjoy!
As I read everything possible about birth in the US, in the run up to my Lamaze teacher training, I keep contrasting Laos and the US in my mind.
Laos needs so much: training of midwives, a system of prenatal visits, supplies for birth (clean birth kits), transportation and access to emergency care, etc…
As I see it the US needs less. Less fear about and less intervening in what should be a natural process. We have C-section rates of +30% (WHO suggests between 5-15%) and rising maternal mortality rates. Excessive in-hospital monitoring and near-universal use of pain medications disrupt normal birth. Transforming Maternity Care reveals that our system is very costly as well.
The largely healthy and low-risk population of childbearing women and newborns experiences 6 of the 10 most common hospital procedures…
Care of childbearing women and their newborns is by far the most common reason for hospitalization, and facility charges billed for “mother’s pregnancy and delivery” and “newborn infants” ($98 billion in 2008) far exceed charges for any other hospital condition in the United States. Medicaid covers about 41% of births while private insurance covers about 52%. The United States spends far more on maternity care than any other industrialized country.
I know that we are lucky, especially when you compare neonatal and maternal mortality stats for the US and Laos. We benefit from access to life-saving C-sections, medicinal protection against hemorrhage and infection, and excellent care for our newborns that need it. However, I am pretty sure, as I read the literature, that the developing world should follow our lead.
Instead, it seems that training birth attendants for normal birth, supported by expertly trained midwives for more complicated, technical deliveries, with surgeons available for the rare C-section, would be best.
These are my thoughts as I read the literature on birth in the developing world and that in the US.
I am preparing for a Lamaze childbirth educator training next week. As a result I am reading alot about birth in the US. Quite a different picture than Laos or Uganda. While moms and babies desperately need skilled attendants and resources in the developing world, the US medicalizes birth to a dangerous degree.
Here’s some numbers/insights I got from “Birth by the Numbers”on the Orgasmic Birth website :
4, 138, 349 births in the US 2005
1% or 40,000 births
18,884 infant deaths (1st month of life) 2005
1, 248, 815 C sections
Calculate neonatal mortality rate =
infant deaths in first 28 days x 1,000 / live births
US 4.6 deaths/1,0000 = We are 42nd in the world.
Critics say: 1. Not fair to compare US to small homogeneous countries. 2. Use perinatal stats not neonatal because countries count deaths differently.
If we look at countries with 100,000+ births and use perinatal mortality stats the US ranks 15 of 16. We also have the highest maternal mortality. African American women die at a rate 6 or 7x times higher than birthing women in other industrialized countries.
US made no improvement in neonatal mortality in 2000-2005. Industrialized countries are improving. Maternal mortality in US is getting worse – 54% more deaths. Industrialized countries went down 16%.
C-sections are overused in US, leveled in Scandanavia, UK, Germany. If 30% rate then you are doing c-sections on low risk mothers, who has the risk of surgery: complications, infection without benefits to mom and baby.
It’s not a question of moms age: women of all ages
It’s not a question of baby age: all gestational ages
Black women have highest rates. Strong regional patterns of rates.
Mothers driving, asking for? In a study of 252 only 1 (0.4%) met the criterion for 1. request before 2. asking for csection for no medical reason. They are rare.
Did they feel pressure to have c section? 25% of scheduled c sections, 25% emergency csections, 35% VBACs, 1% vaginal.
Mother are not driving this. It is a shift in the nature of maternity care.
Risk conditions: diabetes, blood pressure (eclampsia) reduced c section rate between 1991-1996 and then back up 1996-2005.
Same for fetal distress, cord prolapse, placenta previa etc… The rates went down 1991-96 and then back up 1996-2005.
Same indications lower threshold.
They have set up a system that reflects the 1% doctrine = fear of the small risk that color the whole type of care.
I am not a medical person — my role in the delivery room as a doula is waist up. However, as I read the research on clean birth kits and birth-related mortality, I am constantly looking medical things up.
As I read more about birth complications and the deadly consequences for mothers and babies, I keep looking back to the leading killers. Hemorrhage tops the list. OK. What can be done? Oxytocin isn’t the answer in the developing world because it needs refrigeration and must be administered by trained personnel. But Misoprostol might just be.
Misoprostol, an oral preparation of prostaglandin (PGE1) analogue, is a prime candidate given its uterotonic properties; ease of use as an oral, vaginal, or rectal preparation; relative low cost in some areas; and stability at high temperature.
Read on http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/484023_5:
and here http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3303907b.html
I am currently reading “Get Me Out, A History of Childbirth” by Randi Hunter Epstein, MD. It’s a great read — engagingly informative.
I got to a chapter that talks about fistulas and was stopped in my tracks. Here’s an explanation from The Fistula Foundation (http://www.fistulafoundation.org/whatisfistula/)
Obstetric fistula is the most devastating and serious of all childbirth injuries. It happens because most mothers in poor countries give birth without any medical help. So many are young girls. Complications from pregnancy and childbirth are among the leading causes of death and disability for women of reproductive age in these places. Obstetric fistula was largely eliminated in the United States in the latter part of the 19th century and early 20th century with improved obstetric care in general and the use of c-sections in particular to relieve obstructed labor.
After enduring days of agonizing, obstructed labor a woman’s body is literally broken by childbirth. During labor contractions, the baby’s head is constantly pushing against the mother’s pelvic bone — causing tissue to die due to lack of blood flow to this area. All of that pushing creates a hole, or in medical terms a “fistula”, between the birth passage and an internal organ such as the bladder or rectum. A woman cannot hold her urine, and sometimes bowel content as well.
Her baby is unlikely to survive. If she survives, a woman with fistula is likely to be rejected by her husband because of her inability to bear more children and her foul smell. She will be shunned by her community and forced to live an isolated existence. These women suffer profound psychological trauma resulting from their utter loss of status and dignity, in addition to suffering constantly from their physical internal injury.
The numbers are staggering
Right now, hundreds of thousands of women are suffering from this heartbreaking, treatable childbirth injury because they are too poor to afford surgery that costs about $450.
This number keeps growing bigger. Each year approximately 100,000 women develop this childbirth injury — or 273 each day. The international capacity to treat fistula patients has been estimated at 6,500 a year — or 18 patients each day. Surgeons would describe this as an enormous backlog of untreated patients. There is clearly an overwhelming need for treating far more women.
The fix is simple but surgical and thus unavailable to women in the developing world. I met a surgeon at the Kenya airport going to do just these surgeries. What amazing, needed work. Overwhelming.